11 foot paywall

The tool, which allows users to avoid paying subscriptions, was developed to protest the way websites are designed to suit Google Search by exploiting that design itself.

Just a story about somebody doing something nice. Newer ». New York Times and possibly other publications have gotten wise to that site's tricks, but it does work as advertised for bunch of others. I use it about as often as I use Just The Recipe , which strips random food blogger pages of all the "Back when I was a little girl on the farm" bullshit. The author would like you to subscribe to help keep this service floating.

11 foot paywall

The motivation makes little sense to me. They could block the Google spider from getting the full content for free just like any other non-paying rando, and just serve it the same teaser content. This seems like a pretty week excuse for bypassing a paywall. A service like 12ft. Then if I put on a clown nose and take the stuff, I'm completely in the right. If the purveyor does not agree then they can: 1. Not put the stuff on the public sidewalk, but offer it inside their store only. Have the cashier, validate that the the customer holds a clowning license issued by the state and is a member in good standing of some clowning association. The argument is not at all anyone is entitled to the stuff no matter what, even in the face of protective measures like 1 and 2. If that doesn't reflect the purveyor's intent, then they have a clear technological avenue for securing the protected content to authenticated users only. I see it in reverse: the reason some news sites struggle to make money is their belief in a broken business model that's perpetuated by mega-corps like Google. The rules of the game are rigged; house always wins.

Running a newsroom is a costly endeavour, and many readers are more than happy to pay for the news. Another user asked but failed to get a reply.

News Tech. By now, most people have encountered a news paywall. Over the past decade, many major news publishers have embraced paywalls in Europe and the US. Running a newsroom is a costly endeavour, and many readers are more than happy to pay for the news. The need for reliable information is more important than ever in our post-pandemic world, with wars and polarising topics like immigration resulting in a deluge of misinformation online. On the other hand, there will always be those who try to circumvent paywalls to access the news for free. Now, a website that was gaining traction for allowing people to do just that has gone dark.

It allows for some online paywalls to be bypassed. It was created by Thomas Millar. In November , host Vercel took the website offline. It was back online the following month. The website's name is based on the phrase "show me a 10 foot wall and I'll show you a 12 foot ladder. The site was available again as of September 11th, but was no longer showing cached versions of pages for NYTimes. On November 2, , the site only displayed an error with a message " Payment Required. This Deployment has been disabled. Your connection is working correctly.

11 foot paywall

Looking for a 12ft Ladder alternative? To assist you, we have compiled a detailed comparison table of the best 12ft ladder alternatives. This table provides a straightforward evaluation, including ratings, key advantages, and potential drawbacks for each option. The recent shutdown of 12ft Ladder, a tool known for bypassing news paywalls, has left many users searching for alternatives. This closure, prompted by legal and ethical concerns, highlights the ongoing tension between open access to information and the rights of content creators. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the demand for tools that balance free access with respect for intellectual property rights grows. These 12ft Ladder alternatives not only offer access to content but also navigate the complex web of legalities and ethical considerations.

Chick fil a near me

I'm using Bypass Paywalls Clean so I've only asked it to work on the hardest ones. We have a full list of supported publications here: [link redacted]. You are correct that it is not "free" but rather "included at no additional charge" should you choose to elect it. Wonder how long the other one will last before the lawyers come for it! Probably not the best idea. The site currently shows a error, which indicates that its content is not available until the client makes a payment. And my fleeting interest isn't worth the annual subscription. This leads me to have a different perspective than the users of popular browsers. I saw them on HN a few weeks ago and haven't really had issues. Edit: Just retested. I'm blowed if I'm going to pay a months subscription to read one article that may, or may not, be of interest. Care to explain this? We have a small Chrome extension that provides some conveniences for you while using 12ft.

B y now, most people have encountered a news paywall.

Why is it always the responsibility of everyone except the people running the business to come up with a business model for them? It's an index of public-facing websites, some with content that requires payment. I feel like the key is to realize the difference between "news" and "editorial" content. I work in an industry where there are legal consequences for misleading language on our site, links that don't work as advertised, etc. Contents move to sidebar hide. It's easy. I wouldn't say this "justifies" a service like 12ft. Fuck 'em. Just a story about somebody doing something nice. We have a full list of supported publications here: [link redacted]. Using these two methods alone will get you most anything you want to read.