Alina chan twitter

If you're a human and see this, alina chan twitter, please ignore it. If you're a scraper, please click the link below :- Note that clicking the link below will block access to this site for 24 hours.

Keep Current with Alina Chan. Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author! Practice here first or read more on our help page! This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story. Become Premium. Thank you for your support!

Alina chan twitter

Thread Reader. Share this page! More info at Twitter Help. Alina Chan. If even more compelling evidence of a lab OriginOfCovid emerges, how will the scientific community scientists, journals, funders, journalists correct for the silencing, intimidation and degradation of rare scientists who dared to speak out and ask for a credible investigation? I implore scientists, especially virologists, who are tenured and more established to please speak up on OriginOfCovid Think not only about the history books but also the risky lab research happening even right now around the world that places millions of lives at risk. Defuse is compelling evidence for a likely lab OriginOfCovid I believe lab leak should be the default hypothesis. However, there is a gap in the publicly available evidence. We don't know what happened in at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Different people fill in that gap differently. Some believe the Wuhan scientists gave up on the experiments in Defuse because they didn't get a bit of money from the US. Others believe they followed through on those risky plans at low biosafety and caused the pandemic. How does this protect or benefit people in their country? How could it even be used as a threat without self-destruction since viruses don't care about nationality? Can anyone provide a single realistic scenario where enhancing viruses in the lab helps with biodefense?

Retrieved

Alina Chan is a Canadian molecular biologist specializing in gene therapy and cell engineering at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard , where she is a postdoctoral fellow. During the COVID pandemic she became known for questioning the prevailing consensus regarding the origins of the virus and publicly advocating a laboratory escape hypothesis. Chan was born in Vancouver, British Columbia , to Singaporean parents. Her family returned to Singapore shortly after, where she grew up. She returned to Canada after high school to study biochemistry and molecular biology at the University of British Columbia , where she earned a PhD.

E ver since the first reports of a coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, a megacity in central China, the origins of Covid have been steeped in controversy. Was Sars-CoV-2, to give the virus its official name, the result of a natural spillover event from animals to humans or was it the product of laboratory experimentation? Although most cases clustered around a seafood market that also sold wild animals, it did not escape the attention of western intelligence agencies that nine miles to the south lay the Wuhan Institute of Virology WIV. Nor that for many years researchers at the secure biosafety facility had been exploring caves in Yunnan, in southern China , in search of bats that harbour Sars-like viruses and isolating genetic material from their saliva, urine and faeces. The fact that the outbreak had begun in the same city as the WIV was too much of a coincidence to ignore.

Alina chan twitter

They discuss the evidence of a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, media and academic censorship of this topic, the history of collaboration between western scientists and Chinese labs, the risks of "gain-of-function" research, the evidence for the zoonotic origins of SARS-CoV-2, the initial complacency and denialism of the Chinese, the biosafety levels at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, molecular evidence of a lab leak, the practical constraints on synthesizing viruses, lack of international cooperation, conspiracy theories promulgated by the CCP, EcoHealth Alliance, different kinds of "gain-of-function" research, virus hunting, the history of lab leaks, risk and reward in the search for knowledge, Anthony Fauci, and other topics. Matt Ridley is a writer whose books have been translated into 31 languages and won several awards. Matt sat in the House of Lords between and and served on the science and technology select committee and the artificial intelligence select committee. He was founding chairman of the International Centre for Life in Newcastle.

Philips sonicare w3 premium white

Chan detailed her views publicly in long Twitter postings called "tweetorials" [2] [3] and wrote opinion pieces on the subject with science journalist Matt Ridley in the Wall Street Journal and in The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 14 February Zhan pulled up the raw data from the papers and compared the genomes they had published. Or maybe, she thought, it had been growing in a lab somewhere, perhaps multiplying in human cells or in transgenic mice that had had human genes spliced into them. She asked Zhan to pull up the genomes for the coronaviruses that had been found on surfaces in the Wuhan seafood market. Share this page! Have racist people asked the question above? Today, in the United States and across the globe, there are dozens of labs conducting experiments on a daily basis with the deadliest known pathogens. But Alina Chan tweeted life into the idea that the virus came from a lab". Coronaviruses frequently swap parts—a phenomenon called recombination. To me, it's like a shots on goal scenario where a pathogen has to take numerous opportunities to cause an outbreak.

Alina Chan started asking questions in March She was chatting with friends on Facebook about the virus then spreading out of China.

The Hill. Individual copies of a virus coming from different animals should have small differences, just as individuals of a species have genetic differences. For instance, in its initial description of the virus, in February , the Wuhan Institute failed to note an unusual component called a furin cleavage site, a bit of genetic sequence that is potentially suspicious because furin sites are sometimes intentionally added to viruses to make them more infectious. Authority control databases. After the Newsweek story ran, conservative-leaning publications seized on her paper as conclusive evidence that the virus had come from a lab. Foremost among them was Harvard epidemiologist Marc Lipsitch, who founded the Cambridge Working Group in to lobby against these experiments. Starting with the top 10 easily fact-checked ideas or statements that are not true, although a shocking number of scientists still think these are true. Canadian molecular biologist. For instance, a normal virus collected from bats in the wild, if brought to Wuhan, could have somehow slipped out. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll" threadreaderapp unroll Practice here first or read more on our help page! He wanted to see comparisons to the initial leap of other viruses from animals to humans. But that might not be the case with manipulated viruses from a laboratory. Toggle limited content width.