boeing 777-300er vs boeing 787-8

Boeing 777-300er vs boeing 787-8

The Boeing has revolutionized long-haul travel. It has allowed cheaper long-haul carriers to exist while unlocking new and longer routes.

In the realm of modern aviation, Boeing is established as one of the most influential and innovative aircraft manufacturers. While the two aircraft may seem similar, airlines often choose between them based on their distinct advantages and disadvantages. Note: there is a year difference in release dates between the Boeing and When evaluating technology and passenger comfort, we analyzed how these parameters compared to those of other Boeing aircraft at their respective release time s. The Boeing offers a range of seating options, from economy to business to first class. Its spacious cabin design makes for a comfortable experience for passengers, even on long-haul flights.

Boeing 777-300er vs boeing 787-8

The Boeing and are two of the most popular commercial airplanes currently in service when it comes to wide-body, twin-engine jetliners. For example, both planes are widely used by major airlines like United Airlines or British Airways for long-haul flights. If you want to discover how the Boeing vs comparison plays out, we invite you to read below as we will take a closer look at both aircraft and compare different aspects of the Boeing vs battle such as fuel efficiency, passenger capacity, among other key features. To start the Boeing vs comparison, we must say that the is a more fuel efficient aircraft than the thanks to its use of composite wings and more aerodynamically efficient design. The has a fuel consumption of 9 miles per gallon, while the has a fuel efficiency of 11 miles per gallon. This 3 mile per gallon difference might not seem like much, but over the course of a long flight it can add up to significant savings. For example, on a transatlantic flight from New York to London, a would use approximately gallons of fuel while a would use only gallons. This number represents an interesting amount of money given the current fuel prices, something that United Airlines or Japan Airlines, and other major airlines would not take lightly. In other words, fuel efficiency is definitely a significant aspect for airlines when making the comparison of the Boeing vs since it is critical for long-haul flights where a higher fuel efficiency can result in significant cost savings. Moreover, this allows many airlines to offer lower fares on long haul routes. The next step in this comparison must be the difference in passenger capacity despite both being wide-body aircraft.

In fact, the older design has seen more new Club World suites installed as of late, with Premium Flights reporting in April that these were present on 25 ERs and 6 ERs. Dec 20, What aviation news will you check out next?

Zachary Franklin October 22, When it comes to choosing between Boeing and , it can be a difficult decision. Both are wide-body, long-range airliners that offer a comfortable and efficient flying experience. However, there are some key differences between the two that you should consider before making your choice. Firstly, the Boeing is a larger aircraft than the , with a seating capacity of up to passengers compared to the 's maximum of passengers. This makes the a better option for airlines with high passenger demand.

The Boeing has revolutionized long-haul travel. It has allowed cheaper long-haul carriers to exist while unlocking new and longer routes. But how does it compare to its predecessor? The used to be the industry's long-haul workhorse, and before the Dreamliner arrived, it was thought to have its future guaranteed. The can easily and more efficiently operate many routes the was designed for. As such, many airlines have either upgraded to the or are awaiting the arrival of the next-generation X. But how exactly do the two aircraft compare? Before assessing this, it is worth noting a critical piece of information.

Boeing 777-300er vs boeing 787-8

After the B was retired in , the two largest aircraft that Boeing currently produces are the B and the B Dreamliner. After all, these two planes have a lot in common, they are both twin-engine, dual-aisle, widebody jetliners, designed for medium to long-range flights. The type of routes they fly, aerodrome sizes, and occupancy should all be considered for this comparison. After all, manufacturers design planes according to the demands of airlines, and both these have been designed for different operations, although there is some overlap.

West coast gas brand nyt crossword

It is packed with great features, and, on flights that can last up to 12 hours or even longer, any cabin improvement is well received. With unparalleled levels of efficiency and comfort taking passengers right up into the stratosphere, this remarkable aircraft is sure to remain a favorite among airlines and passengers alike for many years to come. You can find the relevant data in the table below, starting with figures corresponding to aircraft from the older classic series. One would have hoped that Boeing has perfected the assembly and is delivering double-digits every month. Following the previous point, we must speak about passengers comfort. For example, the larger ERs all feature more compact Comparative Analysis When it comes to comparing the Boeing and , there are several factors that come into play. Additionally, the new Dreamliner provides better fuel efficiency than older aircraft, contributing to United's commitment to reducing emissions by 50 percent by Overall, both the Boeing and are impressive aircraft that offer a range of benefits to passengers and airlines alike. In any case, a full rundown of BA's and configurations per SeatGuru reads as follows:. Get the latest aviation news straight to your inbox: Sign up for our newsletters today. While it lacks the high passenger capacity of the and offers a lower range than the ER, the brings improved fuel efficiency and a more modern cabin. Emirates leads with the highest airline orders at , followed by Qatar Airways with and Singapore Airlines with However, the NM gain over the ER is somewhat offset for airlines by the fewer seats it offers. Here are some key differences between the two aircraft:.

.

Despite all of this, Boeing still has hundreds of aircraft in the backlog and is adding more every month. Firstly, the Boeing is a larger aircraft than the , with a seating capacity of up to passengers compared to the 's maximum of passengers. Brazilian aircraft manufacturer Embraer has announced that it has received minute extended twin-engine operations ETOPS approval for its…. This aircraft is a popular choice among airlines for several reasons. Allister Bridger, who would become director of flight operations for British Airways, previously said the following about the ER in a statement seen by Simple Flying:. This is because its premium cabins World Traveller Plus premium economy , Club World business , and First offer a very similar product to the Get the latest aviation news straight to your inbox: Sign up for our newsletters today. Another key feature is the 's quieter cabin, made possible by reduced engine noise and vibration as well as quieter air-con. Related Posts. With a width of For an airline seeking new aircraft with an extended operational range to cover longer distances without the need for frequent refueling or en-route landings, opting for the model would generally be advisable. Leave a comment Please note: comments must be approved before they are published. Its range and cargo capacity make it a popular choice for long-haul flights, particularly for airlines that prioritize passenger comfort. However, there are some key differences between the two that you should consider before making your choice.

2 thoughts on “Boeing 777-300er vs boeing 787-8

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *