Caltex regular employees vs caltex
Caltex Regular Employees vs.
It maintained that the CBA provided only 1 day of rest for employees at the Manila Office, as well as employees similarly situated at the Legazpi and Marinduque Bulk Depots. This day of rest, according to Caltex, was Sunday. It was stated in the CBA that the daily working schedules shall be established by management in accordance with the requirements of efficient operations on the basis of eight 8 hours per day for any five 5 days. Provided, however employees required to work in excess of forty 40 hours in any week shall be compensated in accordance with Annex B of this Agreement. Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of petitioner Union, while finding at the same time that private respondent Caltex was not guilty of any unfair labor practice. ISSUE: Whether or not and undertime work may be offset by an overtime work, respectively on separate days.
Caltex regular employees vs caltex
The CBA included, among others, the following provision:. In conformity with Presidential Decree , otherwise known as the Labor Code of the Philippines, as amended, the regular work week shall consist of eight 8 hours per day, seven 7 days, Monday through Sunday, during which regular rates of pay shall be paid in accordance with Annex B and work on the employee's one " Day of Rest ," shall be considered a special work day, during which " Day of Rest " rates of pay shall be paid as provided in Annex B. Daily working schedules shall be established by management in accordance with the requirements of efficient operations on the basis of eight 8 hours per day for any five 5 days. Provided , however employees required to work in excess of forty 40 hours in any week shall be compensated in accordance with Annex B of this Agreement. Annex "B" chanrobles virtual law library. Caltex's Industrial Relations manager immediately evaluated petitioner's claims and accordingly informed petitioner Union that differential payments would be timely implemented. On 7 July , the Union instituted a complaint for unfair labor practice against Caltex alleging violation of the provisions of the CBA. Caltex denied the accusations of the Union. It averred that Saturday was never designated as a day of rest, much less a "day-off". It maintained that the CBA provided only 1 day of rest for employees at the Manila Office, as well as employees similarly situated at the Legazpi and Marinduque Bulk Depots. This day of rest, according to Caltex, was Sunday. In due time, the Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of petitioner Union, while finding at the same time that private respondent Caltex was not guilty of any unfair labor practice.
Tulin People v. On 7 Julythe Union instituted a complaint for unfair labor practice against Caltex alleging violation of the provisions of the CBA.
Caltex's Industrial Relations manager immediately evaluated petitioner's claims and accordingly informed petitioner Union that differential payments would be timely implemented Saturday, an employees' day of rest, at regular rates, when it should be paying at "day of rest" or "day off" rates. Caltex denied the accusations of the Union. It averred that Saturday was never designated as a day of rest, much less a "day-off". Labor Arbiter Valentin C.
The CBA included, among others, the following provision:. In conformity with Presidential Decree , otherwise known as the Labor Code of the Philippines, as amended, the regular work week shall consist of eight 8 hours per day, seven 7 days, Monday through Sunday, during which regular rates of pay shall be paid in accordance with Annex B and work on the employee's one " Day of Rest ," shall be considered a special work day, during which " Day of Rest " rates of pay shall be paid as provided in Annex B. Daily working schedules shall be established by management in accordance with the requirements of efficient operations on the basis of eight 8 hours per day for any five 5 days. Provided , however employees required to work in excess of forty 40 hours in any week shall be compensated in accordance with Annex B of this Agreement. Annex "B" chanrobles virtual law library. Caltex's Industrial Relations manager immediately evaluated petitioner's claims and accordingly informed petitioner Union that differential payments would be timely implemented. On 7 July , the Union instituted a complaint for unfair labor practice against Caltex alleging violation of the provisions of the CBA. Caltex denied the accusations of the Union. It averred that Saturday was never designated as a day of rest, much less a "day-off".
Caltex regular employees vs caltex
Usage of Service includes all content and functionality available through the MyLegalWhiz website. The Subscriber agrees to provide MyLegalWhiz with accurate email address and contact information. MyLegalWhiz shall not share, rent, sell, or trade Subscriber information. The Subscriber shall be entirely responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of their passwords and account data.
Doodle champion island games gameplay
Work performed on a Saturday is accordingly to be paid at regular rates of pay, as a rule, unless the employee shall have been required to render work in excess of forty 40 hours in a calendar week. Petitioner union also contended that private respondent Caltex in the instant petition was violating the statutory prohibition against off-setting undertime for overtime work on another day. Caltex Refinery Employees Association vs. Labor Arbiter Valentin C. Randolph Jakobetz, F. The plain and ordinary meaning of the language of Article III is that Caltex and the Union had agreed to pay "day of rest" rates for work performed on "an employee's one day of rest". Amores Digest. Overtime Work. Esteva Labor - Dole vs. Flag for inappropriate content. Caltex's Industrial Relations manager immediately evaluated petitioner's claims and accordingly informed petitioner Union that differential payments would be timely implemented Likewise, the shortened work period did not at alleged violations by the latter of the CBA, e. An annex expresses the idea of joining a smaller or subordinate thing with another, larger or of higher importance. It is not a memorandum of amendments or a codicil containing additional or new terms or stipulations.
Case Digest: Caltex, Inc. CRUZ, Petitioners, v.
We conclude that the NLRC correctly set aside the palpable error committed by Labor Arbiter Guanio, when the latter imposed upon one of the parties to the CBA, an obligation which it had never assumed. Labor Congress of The Philippines vs. LA: ruled in favor of the Union, while finding at the same time that Caltex was not guilty of any unfair labor practice. The Court concluded that the statutory prohibition did not apply in this case. PNB Emplyees Association. Domingo v. Marcos vs. It averred that render work in excess of 40 hours in a calendar week. Open navigation menu. It is not a memorandum of amendments or a codicil containing additional or new terms or stipulations.
Between us speaking, I would try to solve this problem itself.
Takes a bad turn.
Bravo, seems remarkable idea to me is