fremm frigate vs type 26

Fremm frigate vs type 26

Russia no doubt technically had more, but several of these are likely out of commission or have been transferred to the navies of other nations such as Ukraine and, ironically, India, fremm frigate vs type 26. An iterative exchange of expertise and experience has obviously been applied to the Indian Navy ships and then translated back into the variants built for the Russian Navy. The advances demonstrated by the new Russian ships were then used to produce a more advanced family of ships for India, and again, the lessons learned applied to the next generation of Russian ships.

Type 26 Global Combat Ship. Taken in combination with the June 28, , announcement that the Australian Navy had selected the Type 26 frigate for its ANZAC replacement program, the position of the Type 26 has dramatically strengthened. In less than a year, the Type 26 has vaulted from a small, also-ran program to the leading contender in the international surface combatants market. Notably, both these recent orders have come from Commonwealth countries. There are significant suspicions that the rapidly approaching exit of the U. This interpretation sees these orders for British products as a mark of approval of the Commonwealth toward the return of Britain to its privileged position within Commonwealth economic circles. This may or may not be true, but the fact remains that the Canadian and Australian orders have given the Type 26 frigate a major boost in the export market for surface combatants.

Fremm frigate vs type 26

The federal government is planning to build 15 new frigates, the British Type This is good news since the navy estimates that the present frigates are nearing the end of their operational life. However, according to a report released in December by the Parliamentary Budget Officer PBO , the costs for the new frigates have skyrocketed and the delivery of the ships will be delayed by decades. It is a fact that building ships in Canada is more expensive than buying off-the-shelf from an offshore supplier. But, the reason they are built in Canada is to hopefully create a domestic supply chain with increased employment, intellectual property and industrial capacity. With the Type 26 frigates there will likely not be a domestic supply chain since all the machinery and combat systems are provided by offshore suppliers. The bottom line is that whether procuring these ships abroad would entail significant savings, or whether these savings would be sufficient to offset the loss-benefit to having a made-in-Canada fleet which will employ thousands of workers. There are many political constraints to consider with all naval construction. There is the geopolitical situation with respect to contractors so that it serves government political objectives and public perceptions. These constraints affect the cost or delay in construction.

Forces Network.

The Type 26 frigate , also known as City-class frigate , is a class of frigates being built for the United Kingdom 's Royal Navy , with variants also being built for the Australian and Canadian navies. In August the first long lead time items for Type 26 were ordered, with manufacturing then expected to begin in and the first Type 26 to be delivered in In June , the Australian Government announced that it had selected a modified version of the Type 26 platform as the planned replacement for its Anzac -class frigate. The amount of the contract will increase as the design work increases. The initial design contract is with Irving Shipbuilding of Halifax.

Type 26 Global Combat Ship. Taken in combination with the June 28, , announcement that the Australian Navy had selected the Type 26 frigate for its ANZAC replacement program, the position of the Type 26 has dramatically strengthened. In less than a year, the Type 26 has vaulted from a small, also-ran program to the leading contender in the international surface combatants market. Notably, both these recent orders have come from Commonwealth countries. There are significant suspicions that the rapidly approaching exit of the U. This interpretation sees these orders for British products as a mark of approval of the Commonwealth toward the return of Britain to its privileged position within Commonwealth economic circles.

Fremm frigate vs type 26

The ship has also packed on tons, now projected to displace 7, tons, up from an originally projected 6, tons. Fully loaded, the ship is expected to weigh in at 9, tons — almost double the 4, tons of the currently fielded Halifax class, the former head of Irving Shipbuilding told the CBC earlier this month. The growing cost of the program is likely to put pressure on the Canadian government to look at different options, though observers say it would be difficult and expensive to scrap the program and start over without sacrificing the capability the Royal Canadian Navy was seeking when it selected the highly advanced hull. The surface combatant program is part of a larger national shipbuilding strategy launched in that was designed to create a stable shipbuilding-industrial base and avoid the boom-and-bust cycles of previous national shipbuilding efforts, said Timothy Choi, a researcher and observer of the Royal Canadian Navy. However, the downside of the build-it-slow strategy is that inflation starts to eat your budget for lunch, he said. The alternative is a loss in shipyard capacity once a class is built. Irving Shipbuilding will start cutting steel in , CBC reported. The weight and cost of the 15 ships are primarily growing because Canada is loading them up with capability, Choi said. The ships will also have X- and S-band navigation radars, will be able to participate in cooperative engagements with the U. Navy meaning it will be able to shoot at targets sensed and relayed by U.

Pronunciation of ukulele

Retrieved 2 January — via YouTube. Archived from the original on 27 April The Halifax class has a crew of between sailors on board for each deployment. That would be left to a government in a far-distant future. However, they are also likely to be less technologically advanced, thus making purchase of the Indian ship a hard sell. The advances demonstrated by the new Russian ships were then used to produce a more advanced family of ships for India, and again, the lessons learned applied to the next generation of Russian ships. Ann Griffiths, 21 February The Royal Canadian Navy is not the only agency to experience cost increases in the ships being […]. Archived from the original on 16 January ABC News Australia. Archived from the original on 24 October Archived from the original on 1 November Low running costs and the ability to operate forward in shallow, coastal areas where larger ships cannot were both important. August

The Type 26 frigate is widely accepted as the best anti-submarine warship design available in the world right now.

Archived from the original on 16 July The ship is expected to enter service in The lead ship of the class, Aquitaine , was commissioned in November by the French Navy. This article should have been written a couple of years ago before the planning process started because your alternative currently does not hold any water. Share this:. The resulting gap would now be filled by a new class of cheaper frigate designated Type Carlo Bergamini. The Canadian Surface Combatant design contract was signed on 7 February by the Liberal government. Retrieved 22 February Why does a ship of the tonnage of CSC carry only 24 Mk 41 cells? But as you suggest, this will provide time for Ottawa to negotiate with Fincantieri Marine to get one or two frigates for the RCN inserted at the end of the first batch of 10 in the U.

3 thoughts on “Fremm frigate vs type 26

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *