lg c3 vs sony x93l

Lg c3 vs sony x93l

The price and performance of high-end mini LED televisions can be a bit confusing these days, though, as OLEDs have gotten both brighter and more affordable, closing what used to be a wide gap between the two technologies.

Sony's mid-ranger is a triumph. Picture quality has come on leaps and bounds, audio is placed with pin-point accuracy, and it offers new gaming features that close the gap between it and market leader LG. The A80L isn't cheap, but it is a lot of TV for the money. While still a very good TV, the C3 can't quite match up to its Sony rival in terms of picture quality. And for sound?

Lg c3 vs sony x93l

.

While all gaming will benefit from what this television has to offer, PS5 players will notice it the most because this television actually communicates with the console. And for sound? Built-in cloud gaming.

.

Released in , it occupies a strange place in Sony's lineup. It's almost an exact copy of the Sony X95K , but it's only available in North America in 65, 75, and inch sizes. It's powered by Sony's Cognitive Processor XR, which is designed to improve overall image processing and upscaling. For gamers, it has HDMI 2. Like past Sony TVs, it's powered by the Google TV smart platform, which is user-friendly and has a ton of apps available to download. It's great for watching shows or sports in a bright room thanks to its high peak brightness and excellent reflection handling. Thanks to its high peak brightness and Mini LED backlight, it looks great in a dark room, resulting in deep blacks with minimal blooming around bright objects. Finally, it's an amazing gaming TV with low input lag, a quick response time, and many additional gaming features, including variable refresh rate support to reduce screen tearing.

Lg c3 vs sony x93l

The LG C3 OLED will deliver superior contrast and deeper blacks for movie viewing, as well as wider viewing angles, making it ideal for a dark-to-moderately lit room and for when viewers are spread out around the room. If you plan to use the TV in a room with lots of sunlight, the Sony might be a better fit. For gaming, both offer high refresh rates and low input lag, but the OLED has a slight edge in motion handling. If sports viewing is important, then the Sony's brightness could offer a more vibrant picture. Give Feedback. Home Recommend.

300 000 free heart of vegas coins

You'll still be dropping a pretty penny, and with the TV likely to have a significant role in your home setup for years to come, making the right decision is crucial. For Sharp, detailed, dynamic… …but subtle and authentic Atmospheric sound. The A80L really wowed our reviewers by proving to be a big upgrade on its predecessor, despite having more or less the same panel hardware. If you are using a smaller media console like I do in my testing room, you can mount them closer to the center. The rear of the TV has some cable management that is facilitated by panels that fit over sections of the rear. Both TVs have operating systems that deliver all major apps in the picture and sound formats they should, but LG's webOS 23 system is more responsive and intuitive, though the Google TV interface that the Sony uses is better than ever before and still improving. But if you have both next-gen consoles or one console and a PC and you want them to both be connected at the same time, one of them is going to be hamstrung. The A80L carries on the same minimalist design language of its predecessor, the A80K. Review scoring. Also of note, uniformity varies from panel to panel, so your experience might be different than mine. No, the weight is entirely the television itself. I notice it most when I need to type out an email address or password. The implementation here is quite good. The options are pretty limited, but you can turn VRR on and off, adjust motion blur, adjust the brightness of the blacks, and enable and customize a crosshair.

The price and performance of high-end mini LED televisions can be a bit confusing these days, though, as OLEDs have gotten both brighter and more affordable, closing what used to be a wide gap between the two technologies. The entire box is just shy of pounds. Most of the time you can blame the stand for that, but the X93L has small, relatively lightweight feet instead of a center-mounted base.

Gone are the superfluous buttons I never used, replaced with a much smaller design that has only the essentials. The A80L really wowed our reviewers by proving to be a big upgrade on its predecessor, despite having more or less the same panel hardware. There are two mounting points for the feet on either side: wide or tight. What feature are you most willing to pay more for on a TV? Not that these TVs are cheap, of course. The C3 also looks practically identical to its predecessor, the Award-winning C2 , but that's more of a positive. These little raised pieces of plastic are quite hard and if you need to use them for more than just a few pushes, they can actually make that pad of my thumb hurt. UK Edition. I look forward to Sony building on this framework in future releases. This X93L is not particularly thin. Social Links Navigation. The Fall Guy Review While the center of the display was exceptional, the performance dipped in the corners.

2 thoughts on “Lg c3 vs sony x93l

  1. You are absolutely right. In it something is also to me it seems it is excellent idea. I agree with you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *