Lgtm means

The Reviewer is Ok with the change and would like to see it on the main branch. Often this is not only seen under code, but in the summary section of the Pull Request, referring to the entire pull request being fine with the reviewer. And sometimes together with a note. Well, in lgtm means setups the approval goes away when the author of the change pushes again onto that branch, lgtm means, and the textual note will survive that.

Counterargument: it's probably worse if the devs missed the one important thing in the PR but did a lots of nitpicking that give the feeling of a productive code review. On the subject of acronyms, I have a short story. I once had a colleague who used to ask quite a lot of questions on how to do things. Let me be clear: there's absolutely nothing wrong with asking questions whenever you're unsure - I do this all the time. It was a Friday afternoon one day, and the aforementioned colleague asked his project lead how to do something. As a joke, the project lead sent him a link to lmgtfy let me google that for you.

Lgtm means

An acronym for " Looks Good To Me", often used as a quick response after reviewing someone's essay , code, or design document. LGTM, dude. You can go ahead and push this craxy code to the prod server. Let's Get This Merged. A phrase of encouragement , typically used in code reviews. This code is awesome. Yet another inclusive acronym, stands for "Lesbian Gay Transgender Martian ". Commonly used by aliens to infiltrate human societies, when they forgot their camouflage kit in the spaceship. Hello fellow humans , we are from the LGTM community, we come in peace. An acronym for "Literally Garbage To Me, often used as a quick response after reviewing someone's code or design document which is nonsense and should be moved to trash as it just wasted someones life time reading it.

Aura : The unified graphics compositor docs. Infobar : The thing that drops down below asking if you want to save a lgtm means, did you mean to go to another URL, etc.

At Google, we optimize for the speed at which a team of developers can produce a product together , as opposed to optimizing for the speed at which an individual developer can write code. If you are not in the middle of a focused task, you should do a code review shortly after it comes in. One business day is the maximum time it should take to respond to a code review request i. Following these guidelines means that a typical CL should get multiple rounds of review if needed within a single day. There is one time where the consideration of personal velocity trumps team velocity.

You can help confirm this entry by contributing facts, media, and other evidence of notability and mutation. LGTM is an acronym for "Looks Good To Me" that is primarily used by programmers to express's one approval or favorable feedback during the review process of a software product. While the slang term is believed to have been used by developers since as early as the mid-to-late s, it entered the general lexicon of online coding communities during the early s, particularly on the code repository hosting service Github. While the story behind the coinage of LGTM remains murky at best, the earliest known use and explanation of the acronym can be traced to a feature summary of Google Mondrian, a peer-review software application for programmers, posted by Niall Kennedy [3] on November 30th, In explaining the most common method of peer-review, Kennedy mentions how reviewers would typically type in "LGTM" to express their approval, especially when communicating via email. Previous to Mondrian code review was conducted largely over e-mail using Google command-line wrappers built on top of Perforce. A developer could initiate a code review from within the g4 mail tool, which would fire off an e-mail and begin a review thread. Following the launch of the code-sharing community Github in April , LGTM became widely adopted by members on the site, particularly when leaving feedback in the comments section. On April 12th, , software engineer Rachel Kroll wrote a blog post pointing out the double-entendre behind using a custom-engraved rubber stamp for LGTM, since the widespread usage of the acronym itself suggests a lack of substantial deliberation in the review process, a behavior that is otherwise known as "rubber stamping". By using this site, you are agreeing by the site's terms of use and privacy policy and DMCA policy.

Lgtm means

Internet » Chat -- and more Miscellaneous » Unclassified. We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe. If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly. Forgot your password? Retrieve it.

Porsche panamera reliable

There are usually two sheriffs at one time. Sign me up. Improve this page. If you follow these guidelines and you are strict with your code reviews, you should find that the entire code review process tends to go faster and faster over time. Unfortunately, he didn't see the funny side and stormed out of the office in a rage. Developers learn what is required for healthy code, and send you CLs that are great from the start, requiring less and less review time. When we talk about the speed of code reviews, it is the response time that we are concerned with, as opposed to how long it takes a CL to get through the whole review and be submitted. All of us can be in the "questions" side sometimes but whenever this manners keep showing up as the norm Counterargument: it's probably worse if the devs missed the one important thing in the PR but did a lots of nitpicking that give the feeling of a productive code review. Most complaints about the code review process are actually resolved by making the process faster. Building buildbot : A column in the build waterfall, or the slave machine connected to that column, or the build waterfall infrastructure as a whole. There are also emergencies where CLs must pass through the whole review process very quickly, and where the quality guidelines would be relaxed. A phrase of encouragement , typically used in code reviews. If a reviewer only responds every few days, but requests major changes to the CL each time, that can be frustrating and difficult for developers.

.

This is done when either:. Let's Get This Merged. Most likely redundant or not well written or in coding considered the consequences of it. Software engineer. Did they branch off of the right features? LGTM, dude. On the subject of acronyms, I have a short story. If the reviewer requests the same substantial changes changes which really do improve code health , but responds quickly every time the developer makes an update, the complaints tend to disappear. Are you sure you want to hide this comment? Feb 19, Senior WebDev. Let's connect to drive digital transformation in your org. Guy one: Alright dammit Often shouted to rouse lazy party goers or others in the weight room.