Marantz 2245

This is a classic solid state Marantz receiver. It was produced marantz 2245 to around and put out 45 watts per channel into 8 ohms, marantz 2245. As you can see the Marantz has a Mid tone adjustment which is nice.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen. Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser. Forums New posts Search forums Subscribe. Media New media New comments Search media. Members Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts. Log in Register.

Marantz 2245

My best friend bought this Marantz receiver in while serving in the US Navy. Traveling around the world with him during his tour of duty, this classic system finally settled in California and served him well until the late 90s, when it gave way to a modern home-theater system. How could I resist? I fondly remember selling these things when they were new. In the receiver wars of the mids, Marantz was a big player, and very successful in battles with Sony, Pioneer, Sansui, and Kenwood. The represented the mid-level model, and the little brother to the Still, the former touted more guts, better features, and a better tuner section than the entry-level The Marantz also sounded, offering a slightly warmer sonic presentation along with decidedly more elegant cosmetics that many enthusiasts favorably compared to those of McIntosh. With the exception of a short service visit in the s, during which it had several resistors replaced, this example is bone stock and without modifications. A little cosmetic cleanup brings its beauty back to life. Yep, this sucker is heavy, tipping the scales at just over 30 pounds.

You will have to pay the collector price, it is what it is. This can result in some strange behaviors. I do not want to use eBay and have to marantz 2245 it.

We Sound Better. Stereo Receivers. If you have any problems opening files please read the download FAQ. All files are provided under strict licence and reproduction without prior permission or for financial gain is strictly prohibited. If you have additional documentation please consider donating a copy to our free archive.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen. Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser. Forums New posts Search forums Subscribe. Media New media New comments Search media. Members Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts. Log in Register. Search titles only.

Marantz 2245

My best friend bought this Marantz receiver in while serving in the US Navy. Traveling around the world with him during his tour of duty, this classic system finally settled in California and served him well until the late 90s, when it gave way to a modern home-theater system. How could I resist? I fondly remember selling these things when they were new. In the receiver wars of the mids, Marantz was a big player, and very successful in battles with Sony, Pioneer, Sansui, and Kenwood. The represented the mid-level model, and the little brother to the Still, the former touted more guts, better features, and a better tuner section than the entry-level The Marantz also sounded, offering a slightly warmer sonic presentation along with decidedly more elegant cosmetics that many enthusiasts favorably compared to those of McIntosh.

Pisa airport to pisa centrale train station

Reviewed Apr 01st, by Old The is the same as the except for less features and a smaller power transformer, filter caps are identical on both. If you're truly set on a vintage marantz receiver, that's fine, I've had many. Submitted by Frank on July 28th, I played around with different speakers, and most sounded good KLH 17, Sonus Faber, fullrangers, and etc. You must log in or register to reply here. Click to expand I'd side with the bigger receiver, in fact if you don't need want a tuner I'd point you toward the many many integrated amplifiers that you can buy for that money, that will be so much better and more powerful. Any feedback would be appreciated. Sep 10, analog addict. I only gave my modest advice because the OP stated he's not a very critical listener and still has to pick up speakers and turntable. Still, the former touted more guts, better features, and a better tuner section than the entry-level Listening to it yesterday, I noticed that all the lights were flickered a bit though the receiver still sounded fine. In my original post I should have clarified that I was limiting my choices to which Marantz receiver to buy. The was a better unit in every way except for the tone.

This is a classic solid state Marantz receiver. It was produced from to around and put out 45 watts per channel into 8 ohms.

Feb 2, Chrisxo Search titles only. Search forums. Sep 10, analog addict. Submitted by JD13 on July 27th, I have the wooden case, and the owner's manual, but not the original carton. Submitted by Frank on July 28th, More pleasingly, the somewhat warm and friendly tonal balance I remembered is back in full force—a good thing. Gallery Requests Search. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Fortunately, no smoking transistors or loud bangs from aged capacitors—now well past their freshness date—interrupted my sessions. I had similar issues with intermittent audio. Chrisxo AK Subscriber Subscriber. This will be in a 20'x18' room that I don't really crank the sound in. Just my opinion.