Snapdragon vs exynos processor

Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Geekbench scores are a great way to get a high-level overview of the computational snapdragon vs exynos processor from one generation to the next. They don't tell us anything else about a chipset or its power consumptionbut they serve as a solid point of comparison. The data collected here comes from Geekbench 5 scores of every Samsung flagship from the Galaxy S5 onwards, and it's created from a median of benchmarks run on each base device, snapdragon vs exynos processor.

Exynos vs Snapdragon. Which one to choose? This question is in the minds of all Android smartphone users. Read on find out which one is suitable for you. The Samsung Exynos vs Qualcomm Snapdragon is a competition that has been going on for many years now. While it could be argued that public perception favours Qualcomm Snapdragon chips, it cannot be denied that Samsung has made a lot of innovation when it comes to its own Exynos chipsets.

Snapdragon vs exynos processor

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more. IP68 rating, wireless charging. But one traditional source of contention is that a Galaxy S phone in one region can have worse performance, battery life, and image quality than the same device in another market. This discrepancy exists because Samsung has usually offered two different chipsets in the Galaxy S series, depending on the region. Our own testing showed that the Snapdragon variant offered better multi-core CPU performance and much better graphical performance, while the two were virtually tied in single-core benchmarks. The Snapdragon model has been the better choice for gamers in recent years owing to this performance advantage and broader compatibility when it comes to emulation. The two SoCs were similarly matched in terms of CPU performance, with the Snapdragon variant edging ahead for single-core performance and the Exynos model pulling ahead on multi-core scores. However, we found that the Exynos model offered better sustained performance in some tests. The situation seems to be more favorable for Exynos variants when it comes to endurance. The Exynos version of the Galaxy S21 Ultra repeated this feat, lasting almost half an hour longer than the Snapdragon version in our Speed Test G endurance test. In saying so, we also found that the Exynos variant throttled performance sooner. We tested the battery life of the Galaxy S22 Ultra variants as part of our stress test, finding that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 version lasted for minutes versus minutes for the Exynos variant. Our own Rob Triggs suggested that the difference between the two figures was close enough to be within the margin of error. Another area that sees differences between Exynos and Snapdragon variants is camera quality, as Dxomark and YouTuber Danny Winget showed that the Snapdragon-powered Galaxy S21 Ultra has better image quality than the Exynos model.

Coming to the main differences, Exynos chips are usually Octa-core whereas Snapdragon chips are Quad-Core chips. About Geekbench: Geekbench is a CPU-centric test that uses several computational workloads including encryption, compression text and imagesrendering, physics simulations, snapdragon vs exynos processor, computer vision, ray tracing, speech recognition, and convolutional neural network inference on images.

Pretty much all Samsung users, especially the ones who buy flagship Galaxy phones, complain that they don't want the company's native Exynos chip on their phone—and understandably so. After all, Exynos chips have historically proven to be grossly inferior to their Snapdragon counterparts. So, should Samsung just dump Exynos once and for all? Probably not. Granted, Exynos is not the best, but halting its development would actually end up hurting you as a consumer. Let's take a look at why the Exynos processor is important for both Samsung and Android.

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more. For gamers, both chipsets claim impressive performance gains while also diverging more than ever in terms of their underlying architecture. Both chipsets utilize the same big, medium, and little ArmV9 CPU cores with very similar clock speeds. On paper, the biggest differentiator likely to show up in benchmarks is their graphics capabilities. Xclipse has been subject to much speculation, both good and bad, and is by far the most significant unknown here. Perhaps more surprising and worrying is that neither chipset seems to offer much in the way of a CPU performance uplift over the previous generation.

Snapdragon vs exynos processor

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more. IP68 rating, wireless charging. But one traditional source of contention is that a Galaxy S phone in one region can have worse performance, battery life, and image quality than the same device in another market. This discrepancy exists because Samsung has usually offered two different chipsets in the Galaxy S series, depending on the region. Our own testing showed that the Snapdragon variant offered better multi-core CPU performance and much better graphical performance, while the two were virtually tied in single-core benchmarks. The Snapdragon model has been the better choice for gamers in recent years owing to this performance advantage and broader compatibility when it comes to emulation. The two SoCs were similarly matched in terms of CPU performance, with the Snapdragon variant edging ahead for single-core performance and the Exynos model pulling ahead on multi-core scores. However, we found that the Exynos model offered better sustained performance in some tests.

White pill with h49

Entertainment 3 hours ago. Your Voice. Edited by: Sakshat Kolhatkar. We tested the battery life of the Galaxy S22 Ultra variants as part of our stress test, finding that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 version lasted for minutes versus minutes for the Exynos variant. Instead, it does so to remain the best alternative within the Android space. In other words, it sounds like the Exynos versus Snapdragon rivalry will continue again in The chipset also has a couple of features in common with the brand-new Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC, such as super-fast image generation and Zoom Anyplace camera tech. Trending Quicks. Samsung is one of the largest chip makers in the world. So, should Samsung just dump Exynos once and for all? About the data: The data was collected for each unlocked device, and the model numbers are listed below. The progression of the company's Exynos processors since the Galaxy S5 has been interesting to look at. In fact, Samsung is the only major Android company in the world that not only designs its chips but also manufactures them at its own foundry. This distinction is because of a deal Samsung and Qualcomm have that compels Samsung to use Snapdragon in these locations. We'll see!

Both chipsets this year are more similar than ever, both now sporting similar CPU configurations, and both being produced on a new Samsung 5nm 5LPE process node.

The two SoCs were similarly matched in terms of CPU performance, with the Snapdragon variant edging ahead for single-core performance and the Exynos model pulling ahead on multi-core scores. Read on find out which one is suitable for you. Entertainment 2 hours ago. So, overall the processing power is balanced out between the two processors. This discrepancy exists because Samsung has usually offered two different chipsets in the Galaxy S series, depending on the region. Sini At Miss World Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Samsung also announced the flagship Exynos chipset in late , suggesting that an Exynos-powered Galaxy S24 series will be available in Learn more. The jump from the Exynos to the was probably the biggest overall, with a large increase in single and multi-core performance. There is never a major digression in these chipsets' capabilities, with differences usually boiling down to power consumption or real-world performance.