Taylormade m2 driver review

The TaylorMade M2 driver had itself quite a successful run. Personally, I think the M2 lines and contours have much better flow to them than the line and is much more appealing behind the ball. The TaylorMade M2 driver has a pretty standard contemporary driver shape. Its shape is large enough to inspire confidence but with a medium footprint, taylormade m2 driver review.

Like the two highest profile athletes of one of your main competitors voluntarily switching to your product just as you launch the new version. However looking on the bright side, with Tiger and Rory choosing the TaylorMade M2 driver in it shows that TaylorMade are on the right track and therefore the version should be even better. The white titanium leading edge is a narrower shape than the previous version, which makes the black carbon composite section larger and helps with the weight re-distribution. The Speed Pocket has been redesigned and is three times as flexible as the previous M2, and back to the same level as the AeroBurner driver , in order to add as much ball speed as possible. It is also looks a bit more like a Speed Pocket designed specifically for this club rather than the previous model which seemd to have a filled in space where the front weight track from the M1 used to be. In real terms the titanium panel on the toe section of the sole has been sunk in a little, which saves volume here to enable the overall footprint to be larger. It also has the benefit of stiffening the structure of the head, which helps the sound and means they need less sound ribs on the inside, which also saves weight to be used elsewhere.

Taylormade m2 driver review

Pros: A more rearward center of gravity makes the M2 drivers more forgiving than previous TaylorMade drivers. In recent years, TaylorMade was bullish on improving driver distance through launch conditions. The removal of the T-Track created 15 grams of discretionary weight, which was redistributed low and rearward in the driver heads, approximately where its gold sole weight is located. The M2 has a slightly rougher face texture than the M1, which helps reduce spin. According to TaylorMade, the M2 will launch roughly 0. In my testing of the M2 driver, however, I found that the M2 not only produced more consistent launch conditions than the M1 in its most rearward setting, but offered higher ball speeds on average. With the same shaft, I was able to maintain my launch conditions increasing ball speed about 2 mph. For that reason, I hit the M2 a few yards farther than the M1. The M2 driver is more aerodynamic than the M1 due to the removal of its sole weights. It should be noted that since I was already achieving favorable launch conditions with an M1 in its rearward-weight setting, I was a prime candidate for the M2 driver. The advantages of the M2 will be for golfers who struggled to create maximum ball speed with the M1, or are looking for more consistency. An M2 driver will also assist golfers who tend to fade their drives, as its more rearward weight position not only creates an overall higher ball flight, but more dynamic lofting at impact that generates increased face closure for added draw bias.

Lower spin and much more distance. So Long and so forgiving and so worth the money. Reply Report comment.

Obviously there is a bit more to it than that, but the price point is one of the main reasons why this club exists, as the M1 offers as much adjustability as anything out there to enable you to fine tune your driver performance to match your swing. However the M1 is expensive and nowadays a lot of drivers that just have an adjustable hosel have head designs that are so forgiving that they can suit an ever widening range of golfers without having to resort to moving weights around the sole. This is where the M2 comes in and is the first multi-material driver TaylorMade has created in their lower price point range. It replaces the AeroBurner driver and in that respect the looks could not be more different. Out goes the white crown, red paint, AeroHosel fin and raised crown and in comes the white titanium front section combined with the black carbon composite crown that makes the M2 look as great as the M1. Once they make allowances for the bonding required to join the two pieces, this leaves around 6g that can be moved to the sole, which is a lot in club heads.

Low-spin performance but still from a forgiving clubhead creates an irresistable package for golfers of all skill levels and swing speeds. You could argue the performance is too similar to M1 and those that need the extra forgiveness in M2 would benefit more from the extra draw bias available in M1. Why you can trust Golf Monthly Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test. Golf Monthly's TaylorMade M2 driver review, a model that features the same weight-saving carbon composite crown as the M1 driver but without the T-Track adjustability.

Taylormade m2 driver review

Ironically, last year, many players found AeroBurner more impressive than R Will the same pattern emerge this year? At address, the TaylorMade M2 driver is identical to the M1.

Jambox eixample

More aerodynamic due to no sole weights.. Bishop let me know the life cycle of the sldr driver before it was replaced by the R After hitting both the 1 and 2 versions of the clubs in the two different sizes into one of the tragically neglected simulators, I personally preferred the overall balance of the 2 version, but I have never felt comfortable swinging a club with such a big head — they always seem so clunky-awkward and out of balance to me during that critical mid-point transition period of the swing. We get it. Go ahead and release a new one, guys. If you get a quality one from ping or titleist, you can get a new one every 6 years. Now TMAG is charging more but upgrading their standard shaft options. I saw an average of a 1. Bill plays Scott Readman Concepts putters and accessories. Continue Reading. Plugged In Golf. Decent article, but it would have been good to know before the very end that the club has a draw bias. The C is just slightly higher than mid-launch for me, but the low spinning head never allowed my shots to balloon or rise even into the wind. Do you also complain about product cycles with car manufacturers, cell phones, PC and Mac operating systems, televisions, or anything else technology related??

Long story short, I liked the M2 driver a lot more than the M1 because I found it much easier to hit. I got a good amount of distance from the club and it was a lot more forgiving than most on off-center hits. Overall, I think this would be a great driver for your average recreational golfer.

So for everyone out there that backs TM or hates them for whatever reason you need to think about this from the business model perspective alone. I ordered the Ping G I think these should be called overviews…a review implies you are going to actually assess the value and performance of the club. Then you have a spring launch for the more price sensitive markets who start their season in the spring. Bill Bush. It is also looks a bit more like a Speed Pocket designed specifically for this club rather than the previous model which seemd to have a filled in space where the front weight track from the M1 used to be. Adam Feb 15, at am. Launch, spin, ball speed and most other numbers were also pretty similar from the centre of the face and that is to be expected. The sound of both models is excellent in their own way and this is where there are a lot of differences in the construction on the inside, as TaylorMade use fins located all around the inside of the head to improve how it sounds. A bigger deal for some golfers might be the G crowns. Wait…an intelligent post, and an intelligent reply in the same TM thread?