We vibe sync class action lawsuit

In order to induce purchase and use, Standard Innovation failed to disclose the reality of its invasive information collection practices to its customers. Please note that providing your information creates no financial obligation for you. You are not charged any fee or cost for joining this class action, we vibe sync class action lawsuit. Our law firm is paid a contingency fee from the compensation recovered, only if the class action is successful.

A quick visit to the website for We-Vibe — a sex toy for couples — shows a list of breathless reviews for the product. But a lawsuit filed in Chicago this week claims some customers aren't so stimulated by the product. The suit alleges that the company, based in Ottawa, Ont. The lawsuit was initially launched by a Chicago-based woman, identified in the statement of claim only as N. That would include when it's on, how long it's being used for, what settings it's on, the temperature of the device Rapp says customers who have used the product through the app could be covered under this class-action suit.

We vibe sync class action lawsuit

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first. If you get Global News from Instagram or Facebook - that will be changing. Find out how you can still connect with us. This article is more than 6 years old and some information may not be up to date. The lawsuit — filed in the U. Standard Innovation has maintained that customer data was not compromised; however, the lawsuit inspired many to ponder why a sex toy company would want to collect such personal information in the first place. In September, the company reiterated its commitment to privacy and security, noting it was engaging with privacy experts to review its data practices. The company also updated its We-Connect app which allowed users to control how their data was used and clearly laid out its privacy and data policies. As part of the settlement, U. Click to return to homepage Leave a comment Share this item on Facebook Share this item via WhatsApp Share this item on Twitter Send this page to someone via email See more sharing options. Full Menu. Search Menu. Close Local your local region National. Search Submit search Quick Search.

This website will: Remember which cookies group you accepted Essential: Remember your cookie permission setting Essential: Allow session cookies Essential: Gather information you input into a contact forms, newsletter and other forms across all pages Essential: Keep track of what you input in a shopping cart Essential: Authenticate that you are logged into your user account Essential: Remember language version you selected.

Sex toy company Standard Innovation Corp. Two women launched a class-action lawsuit against the company last year in relation to the We-Vibe 4 Plus, dubbed the "No. The Internet of Things is creating serious new security risks. We examine the possibilities and the dangers. Users are able to connect the product to a smartphone over Bluetooth in order to control the vibrator's modes and intensity settings. In addition, the toy can be remotely controlled through the web so couples apart can still have fun.

If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information. Under the terms of the settlement, Standard Innovation Corp. Two anonymous plaintiffs hit the sex toy company with the class action lawsuit in after they discovered that the dates and times and even the intensity setting of the vibrator they were using were being recorded by Standard Innovation. The plaintiffs alleged that Standard violated the Federal Wiretap Act as well as Illinois privacy laws. According to the class action, Standard was sending intimate details about when and how We-Vibe and We-Connect users were using their vibrators and associated web application for storage on their servers in Canada. In addition to the specific dates and times that a particular person used their We-Vibe, Standard was also recording the intensity of the vibration level the sex toy was being set at for the use. According to the proposed agreement, vibrators have been purchased by about , Class Members and , of them use the We-Connect app with it as well.

We vibe sync class action lawsuit

If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information. Please see what other class action settlements you might qualify to claim cash from in our Open Settlements directory! Parties have reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit over allegedly unauthorized data collection linked to We-Vibe vibrators. Consumers who purchased a Bluetooth-enabled We-Vibe device or who downloaded the We-Connect smartphone app may be eligible for a settlement payment. Defendant Standard Innovation Corp. These vibrators are designed for use with the We-Connect smartphone app, which allows users to control the vibrator through a Bluetooth link to their smartphone. Plaintiff N. She alleges Standard Innovation Corp.

Pegasus flights to istanbul

It is important to note that the company will no longer tag on identifiers when it comes to user data. Eve-Lynn Rapp is the San Francisco-based attorney handling the suit. An attorney-client relationship may be formed only after we check for conflicts of interest and the firm and you sign a mandate agreement. International News U. The girls around Robert G. By submitting your information to us, you are not creating an attorney-client relationship with the firm, although the information will be kept confidential. Log In to Comment Community Guidelines. The company will also track the IP address — which would allow them to understand where [the customer] is located," Rapp explains. More on Science and Tech. Information recorded included intensity of the vibration levels, along with the dates and times the toy was used. Home Tech Security. Read more. Home Page. Your email address will not be published.

However, lead plaintiff N. Preliminary approval of the class settlement was granted on Monday by U.

Amelia says:. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. In a September filing, the complaint alleged that "unbeknownst to its customers [ Cookie Box Settings. If you missed out, sign up for our free newsletter to receive updates on new class action lawsuits and settlements. Search Menu. Increase article font size. Benita F Austin says:. September 9, at am. Log In to Comment Community Guidelines.