Xiaomi 13 pro dxomark

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score, xiaomi 13 pro dxomark. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations.

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations. With a DXOMARK Camera score of , the Xiaomi 13 delivered a good performance, thanks to a triple camera configuration that allows for good quality photo and video capture in pretty much all kinds of conditions. The camera also managed to maintain a good tradeoff between image detail and noise reduction , but our testers observed some unwanted artifacts, for example, halo effects and ghosting, especially in scenes where HDR processing kicked in. Autofocus was generally accurate but slow.

Xiaomi 13 pro dxomark

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations. In addition, the camera was capable of producing high image quality at close and medium range tele settings and recorded still images with a wide dynamic range, even in low light. The 13 Pro camera has some similar hardware to the Xiaomi 12S Ultra, but there are a few differences to note. Both models have Leica-branded lens and the Leica color modes. Overall camera performance was very similar between the two devices, with differences in some sub-attributes. However, it has improved over the 12S Ultra at close and medium-range settings, especially when shooting in low light. When compared to the current No. In terms of exposure, the Xiaomi displayed unnatural contrast in backlighting conditions which was much less noticeable on the Honor. In video mode, both exposure and focus were much less stable on the Xiaomi 13 Pro than on the Honor.

Xiaomi 13 Pro - Slight loss of detail on eyelashes.

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations. With an overall Camera score of , the Xiaomi 13T Pro ranked 8 points higher than the Xiaomi 13T, even though both phones are equipped with the same camera hardware.

Xiaomi may be known mostly for its excellent budget phones , and while these may make up the biggest portion of the company's revenue, the brand has also been offering enticing high-end flagships for a while now. Its products never felt like they quite reached the same level of refinement and polish as its competitors, but with the Xiaomi 13 Pro, this is changing. The latest Xiaomi flagship feels the most grown up yet. The Xiaomi 13 Pro has one of the best camera sensors and setups in the industry right up there with the Vivo X90 Pro , an excellent build quality with a high-end ceramic back, and finally offers IP68 water and dust proofing. It's also right up there with the competition when it comes to software support. But can Xiaomi really compete with the big boys like Apple, Samsung, and Google? That's what we're setting out to find out. The Xiaomi 13 Pro does a lot of things right and offers an incredible hardware experience thanks to excellent build quality and a great camera system. Unfortunately, the phone falls short in the usual areas that Xiaomi struggles with: software and stability.

Xiaomi 13 pro dxomark

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations. In addition, the camera was capable of producing high image quality at close and medium range tele settings and recorded still images with a wide dynamic range, even in low light. The 13 Pro camera has some similar hardware to the Xiaomi 12S Ultra, but there are a few differences to note.

Henselite bowling shoes

The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Learn more about how we test camera. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing , quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. Oppo A16s 5G. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. This device had good exposure and white balance stability under different light conditions, together with a wide dynamic range , resulting in good detail rendering in high and low illuminated areas of the image. Xiaomi 13T Pro - Accurate face exposure. Autofocus was generally accurate but slow. Position in Global Ranking 31 st. Oppo Find X3 Neo. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score.

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer. In video, the 13T Pro showed a good preservation of details and good exposure stability under the different light conditions tested: outdoors, indoors, and low light. This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Oppo Find X6. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G. Google Pixel 6a. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus Snapdragon. Oppo Find N2. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. Huawei P Xiaomi 12S Ultra — Exposure instabilities towards the end of the transition.